• Posts by Peter Lewicki
    Posts by Peter Lewicki
    Of Counsel

    Peter Lewicki represents public entities in a wide array of labor and employment matters.  His experience includes representing clients in grievance, disciplinary and termination matters, Skelly hearings, termination ...

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Law Enforcement Agency Liability for Safeguarding Peace Officer Personnel Information (AKA “Pitchess”) and Duties to Investigate Citizen Complaints

On February 28, 2025, in Santa Ana Police Officers Association, et al, v. City of Santa Ana, the California Court of Appeal’s Fourth District ruled on a challenge by the Santa Ana Police Officers Association (“SAPOA”) and several of its officers who filed anonymously. The Court was asked to review the Superior Court’s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by the SAPOA and the officers alleging that the Santa Ana Police Department (“SAPD”) violated numerous state laws governing confidentiality of peace officer personnel records, investigations of citizen complaints, and labor rights to access information upon request.  The Court of Appeal’s decision rejected most of SAPOA and the officers’ arguments and clarified some of the important duties of law enforcement agencies to protect personnel information of officers and to investigate allegations of misconduct.

Public Employment Relations Board Finds Pitchess Process Applies to Information Request for Peace Officer Personnel Records Arising Outside Labor or Arbitration Dispute

On January 31, 2025, the California Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB” or “Board”) held in Trustees of the California State University (Stanislaus) (2025) PERB Dec. No. 2940-H that recognized unions cannot obtain confidential peace officer personnel records through a traditional request for information (“RFI”), but instead only through the Pitchess process.[1] PERB’s ruling signals a rare limitation on the otherwise-broad right of unions to obtain information from employers pursuant to their statutory representational duties. While the Board has found statutory labor law to apply unconstrained by the parallel provisions in other sources of state law (such as the CPRA), the clear and “unique” Pitchess statutory scheme required the Board to place limits on union’s RFI rights. 

Categories: PERB ruling
Tags: PERB

On February 29, 2024, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 400, allowing law enforcement agencies to release statements announcing terminations of police officers and custody officers.  This law is the latest demonstration of California’s commitment to transparency and granting the public more access to information concerning law enforcement employment matters.  This new legislation further amends Penal Code section 832.7 and permits, but does not mandate, employing law enforcement agencies, to disclose peace officer terminations for cause and their reasons, under certain circumstances.  This bill passed both the Assembly and Senate unanimously.  Its passage was not without controversy, as opponents initially feared disclosure of terminations would be mandatory. 

Other AALRR Blogs

Recent Posts

Popular Categories

Contributors

Archives

Back to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.