Labor & Employment Law Blog

I. Summary

On December 30, 2024, and just before the New Year struck, the California Court of Appeal issued a favorable employer decision on the enforceability of arbitration agreements in Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) cases. In Leeper v. Shipt, Inc., (2024 WL 5251619), the Second District Court of Appeal, Division One, in Los Angeles, held that because every PAGA action necessarily includes an “individual PAGA claim,” PAGA plaintiffs cannot attempt to avoid arbitration by characterizing their lawsuit as a purely representative PAGA claim made on behalf of only other allegedly aggrieved employees, but not the named representative themself. In other words, the court would not allow a “headless” PAGA action to proceed. Accordingly, the court directed the trial court to order the plaintiff, Christina Leeper’s individual PAGA claim to arbitration and stay the representative action in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4.  This guidance should help end recent attempts by many plaintiffs attempting to circumvent arbitration by “disclaiming” their own individual claims in order to represent only others.

1. Summary of the Ruling

In Gonzalez v. Nowhere Beverly Hills LLC, 2024 WL 4948533 (Dec. 3, 2024), the California Court of Appeal for the Second District held that plaintiff-employees cannot simultaneously allege their employers’ corporate subsidiaries and parent companies acted as “joint employers,” while also attempting to avoid arbitration with these related entities by arguing they were not parties to the employment contract and arbitration agreement.