Article 11, Section 10 of the California Constitution prohibits public agencies from granting extra compensation to officers or employees after service has been rendered. Employee salaries subject to collective bargaining are often not determined until later into the fiscal year. When an increase in employee salaries is negotiated during the school year, retroactive pay at the increased rate (or a decreased rate) may violate this constitutional prohibition.
Courts have consistently held public employers may retroactively pay employees in situations where the “adjusted salary rates were made retroactive to a date when the salary rates were indefinite and subject to future determination.” (San Joaquin County Employees’ Assn., Inc. v. County of San Joaquin (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 83; Goleta Educators Assn. v. Dall’Armi (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 830.)
The governing board may, before the first day of the fiscal year, take formal action (typically by adopting a resolution) declaring salaries “indefinite,” and avoid the constitutional proscription against “extra compensation” when adjusting salaries retroactively. This requirement differs for represented (bargaining unit) and unrepresented employee salaries.
Retroactive Salary Adjustments for Represented Employees
For employees represented by bargaining units, salaries become indefinite upon expiration of a collective bargaining agreement or the compensation provisions of the agreement. Thus, under these circumstances governing boards need not declare these salaries indefinite. However, the time at which salaries become indefinite varies depending on whether a contract reopener is in place. Salaries are considered indefinite and board action is not required when a contract reopener on salaries becomes operative on a specific date and was agreed to on or before that date.
By contrast, salaries become fixed when (1) the governing board approves the agreement; (2) there are no reopeners on salaries; and (3) contract reopeners have no specified effective date. When a contract reopener has a specified date, a later agreement for salary adjustments may apply retroactively to any time after the established reopening date.
Where the employer wants to be able to retroactively adjust compensation, regardless of the status of reopeners, the governing board should adopt a resolution that declares “indefinite” the salaries of represented employees. This resolution can be combined with the declaration of indefinite salaries for unrepresented employees. The resolution must be adopted before the first day of the fiscal year (i.e., by June 30).
The employer must then give notice of the resolution to the exclusive representatives of the affected bargaining unit employees.
Retroactive Salary Adjustments for Unrepresented Employees
Unlike represented employee salaries, which are uncertain pending negotiations, the compensation of unrepresented employees is not subject to bargaining.
If unrepresented employee salaries are not fixed before the first day of a fiscal year, and the governing board seeks to increase (or decrease) these salaries retroactively any time during that year, the board must adopt a resolution declaring unrepresented employee salaries “indefinite.” This resolution must be adopted before the first day of the fiscal year (i.e., by June 30).
The resolution should specify which unrepresented employees are affected, including any individual contracts. The employer must then give notice of the resolution to the affected employees. Because these employees are not represented, each employee should receive individual notice.
- Partner
Tony De Marco specializes in the representation of California employers in all aspects of personnel and labor management. Mr. De Marco is a recognized expert in the areas of discipline, contract enforcement, grievances, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Don't Start from Scratch: Our AI Policy Toolkit Has Your District Covered
- Slurs and Epithets in the College Classroom: Are they protected speech?
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- Matthew T. Besmer
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012