Public Contract Code section 20111.6, which goes into effect on January 1, 2014, requires school districts to prequalify bidders for certain construction projects. Specifically, any school district with an average daily attendance of 2,500 or more must prequalify bidders for: 1) any project using funds from the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 or 2) projects using funds from any future state school bond if the project has projected expenditures of one million dollars or more.
Most of the requirements for the “mandatory prequalification” of Section 20111.6 match the requirements to use the “optional prequalification” process set forth in PCC section 20111.5. Under Section 20111.5, public agencies may use a prequalification process to weed out unqualified bidders. The requirements of this “optional prequalification” process, which include developing a standardized questionnaire and using a uniform system of rating bidders, are also found in the mandatory requirements of PCC section 20111.6. Therefore, school districts should be able to use most of the features of their optional prequalification process to meet the new mandatory prequalification process. However, the mandatory prequalification process includes a couple of key differences that school districts must be aware of in order to fully comply with Section 20111.6.
The new law requires public agencies to provide a list of prequalified electrical, mechanical, and plumbing (MEP) subcontractors to all bidders at least five business days prior to the opening of bids. Thus, school districts must develop a prequalification system, including a standardized questionnaire and rating system, for MEP subcontractors in addition to the prequalification system used for general contractors, to comply with Section 20111.6. While school districts may be able to use some of the same questions used to rate contractors in its MEP subcontractor prequalification process, school districts may need to adjust the rating system to make it applicable. Some of the rating features used for contractors, such as bond capacity, may not be relevant to MEP subcontractors. It also may be helpful to include features within the prequalification process to assess the specific MEP services to be provided by the subcontractors.
Further, because contractors will be limited to using prequalified MEP subcontractors, school districts should be careful to strike the balance between prequalifying enough MEP subcontractors to allow competition among bidders while not lowing the basic standards necessary to hire qualified MEP subcontractors. If the MEP prequalification process is too strict, contractors may be limited in their choice of qualified MEP subcontractors which could lead to higher bids since qualified MEP subcontractors could raise their price due to lack of competition. However, if the prequalification process is too lax, school districts will not be able to use the new requirements to protect themselves against MEP subcontractors who cannot meet the project’s needs.
As noted above, Section 20111.6(j) requires school districts to provide a list of MEP subcontractors to all bidders within 5 days of bid opening. Therefore, school districts should have a mandatory prequalification process in place as soon as possible to create a list of viable MEP subcontractors. If you have any questions about the mandatory prequalification process, and specifically the MEP subcontractor prequalification requirement, please contact us.
- Partner
Bryce Chastain brings the acumen and expertise he has developed over more than two decades in the practice of law for our clients. His primary areas of practice are in construction, real estate, and business transactions for ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
- Fact Specific Analysis is Key when Restricting on Employee Expression
- Monitoring Students’ Online Activities
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012