On February 15, 2012, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued a “notice of proposed rule making,” describing proposed revisions to regulations under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). These regulations are proposed primarily to implement recent amendments to the military leave provisions.
The FMLA entitles eligible employees to take job-protected, unpaid leave, for up to a total of 12 workweeks in a 12-month period for certain serious health conditions of the employee or specified family members, or the birth or adoption of a child. The FMLA was amended by the enactment of the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which allows eligible employees to take FMLA leave because of any “qualifying exigency” when the employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent is called to active duty in the Armed Forces in support of a contingency operation. Additionally, the 2008 amendments provide up to 26 workweeks of “military caregiver leave” in a single 12-month period for an eligible employee to care for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness if the employee is the spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin of the covered service member. These two leave entitlements are referred to as “military family leave.”
The FMLA was further amended by the 2010 NDAA, which expands the availability of military family leave. Qualifying exigency leave was expanded to include family members of the regular armed forces, and by adding a requirement that members of the National Guard and reserves be deployed to a foreign country. The NDAA also expanded the definition of a serious injury or illness for military caregiver leave to include an injury or illness that existed prior to service and was aggravated in the line of duty during active duty service.
The proposed regulations implement these new provisions of the FMLA. Additionally, the current regulations allow an eligible employee to take up to 5 days of leave to spend time with a military member on rest and recuperation leave during a period of deployment. The Department of Labor (DOL) proposes to expand this type of qualifying exigency leave to 15 days. With respect to military caregiver leave, the proposed regulations would allow military caregiver leave for qualifying family members of individuals who serve in the regular armed forces and to recent veterans.
The regulatory definition of “serious injury or illness” would be expanded to include conditions that existed before the service member joined the military or served on active duty but were aggravated in the line of duty. Specific to veterans, the expanded definition would include: (1) conditions that occurred while the veteran served and continued after discharge; (2) a physical or mental condition for which the covered veteran has received a Department of Veterans Affairs service related disability rating of at least 50%; or (3) any injury or illness of similar severity that substantially impairs the veteran’s ability to gain or keep a substantially gainful occupation by reason of a service-connected disability, or would do so absent treatment. This third alternative is intended to mirror the way private health care providers make determinations for Social Security Disability claims.
The proposed regulations would allow service members and veterans to obtain certification of a serious injury or illness from an authorized health care provider as defined in the non-military family leave provisions, rather than restricting certification to the Department of Defense or VA-approved providers as in the current regulations. For this reason, the proposed regulations would allow second and third opinions when the certification has been completed by a private health care provider.
The proposed regulations would make various changes to the information employers may require from employees to certify the need for military family leave. New official forms and approved notices are also proposed, as are “corresponding minor changes to the FMLA poster.” If these proposals are finalized, all employers will have to review and revise the posters they display and the forms they utilize for FMLA military family leaves.
The DOL recognizes the potential for eligible employees to take multiple and lengthy periods of leave under the regulations. The current regulation provides that the 26-workweek entitlement for qualifying exigency leave is applied as a per-covered service member, per-injury entitlement. Because there are now two distinct categories of covered service members (a current member of the armed forces and a covered veteran), an eligible employee could potentially take military caregiver leave to care for a current member of the armed forces and, at a later point when the same service member becomes a covered veteran, take a subsequent period of military caregiver leave. Likewise, an eligible employee may take up to 26 workweeks of leave to care for the same covered service member with a subsequent serious injury or illness. All of the eligibility requirements, as the hours of service requirement, would apply in such situations, and an employee may not take more than a combined total of 26 workweeks of FMLA leave during a single 12-month period.
These proposed regulations are not yet final and most do not require compliance at this time. For example, employers are not required to provide employees with FMLA-protected military caregiver leave for the “serious injury or illness of a veteran” until final rules defining the terms are issued. However, immediate compliance is required with the expansion of qualifying exigency leave for foreign deployment of a family member in the regular armed forces. After a 60-day public comment period, the DOL will issue final regulations that employers will be required to follow.
- Partner
Jabari Willis is Partner at Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo in Cerritos, CA. He provides human resources and employment-related counseling and training to employers on a wide variety of issues, including hiring, terminations ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Don't Start from Scratch: Our AI Policy Toolkit Has Your District Covered
- Slurs and Epithets in the College Classroom: Are they protected speech?
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- Matthew T. Besmer
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012