3450 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Mark W. Thompson is a partner in the Riverside office of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, primarily representing public school districts and Boards of Education in the areas of general education law, governance matters including the Brown Act and Public Records Act, certificated and classified employee discipline and reductions in force, harassment and discrimination complaints, grievances, collective bargaining and contract administration. He represents districts before PERB, OCR, DFEH, EEOC and OAH, and in state and federal courts. He also advises on copyright, trademark, licensing and other intellectual property matters.
Mr. Thompson received his Bachelor of Science degree in chemical engineering from California State University, Long Beach, where he was named Outstanding Graduating Engineer. After working for several years in the aerospace industry, he received his Juris Doctor from Whittier Law School, where he was a member of the Whittier Law Review and received a CALI Award for Excellence in Trademarks and Unfair Competition.
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
California State Courts
State Bar of California
Del M. Grace v. Beaumont Unified School District (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 1325. Probationary teacher challenged non-reelection on the basis that she did not receive notice by personal service or certified mail prior to March 15. Court held the absence of personal service or proof of service by certified mail prior to March 15 was not required where she received actual notice before the deadline.
Edwards v. Lake Elsinore Unified School District (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 1532. Former permanent teacher returned within 39 months as a substitute and worked an entire school year in place of a teacher on medical leave. In the following year, she was given a regular teaching position and was granted permanent status and retroactive seniority due to the “tacking” rule in Education Code Section 44918 and the restoration of permanence rule of Section 44931. Teacher claimed she was also entitled to a retroactive pay increase to that of a regular teacher in the substitute year. Court held the substitute classification was proper and tacking under Section 44918 does not entitle the employee to a retroactive pay increase.
Publications and Speaking Engagements
Mr. Thompson presents at workshops and conferences on various subjects in education, employment and labor, governance, and copyright law, and is a trainer for AB 1825 sexual harassment avoidance and in the FRISK® Documentation Model. He trains public agencies on boardsmanship, the Brown Act, ethics and conflicts of interest, investigations, and employee discipline. He is a frequent contributor to firm publications and is a featured presenter for the Inland Personnel Council.